Jacob Fearnley vs Lukas Pokorny Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Fearnley vs L. Pokorny

GBR
3
Win
Played
0
Win

SVK
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fearnley 3 - 0 Pokorny
They have played 6 sets in total, with Jacob Fearnley winning 6 and Lukas Pokorny winning 0. The last match between Jacob Fearnley and Lukas Pokorny was at the Pau Challenger, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Jacob Fearnley getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fearnley | 3 |
| Pokorny | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) Pau Challenger(02-18-25)
(R1) Bratislava 2 Challenger(10-28-24)
(Q1) BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm(10-12-24)
J. Fearnley vs L. Pokorny H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $919,075 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 69.74% (106-46) | Career Total W/L | 57.24% (166-124) |
| 3 | Indoor | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 3 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 43.24% (16-21) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Fearnley vs L. Pokorny Match Preview:
Recent Trends in Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Fearnley has exhibited an exceptional level of skill by winning 52.39% of points on their second serve. Similarly, Pokorny has showcased their proficiency, triumphing in 52.11% of such points. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Insights from Return Game Statistics: Delving into return game stats, it is evident that Fearnley, in their recent form, has achieved a remarkable feat by securing victory in 55.98% of their opponent's second serve points. Pokorny, while not far behind, has accumulated a success rate of 47.64%. The statistics for first serve returns also shed light on this captivating matchup, with Fearnley and Pokorny accomplishing 31.63% and 31.16% respectively. This correlation plays a pivotal role in determining the favored player in this head-to-head clash.
Analyzing Performance Under Pressure: When it comes to saving breakpoints in recent form, Fearnley has demonstrated their mettle by saving a remarkable 69.79% of them. In comparison, Pokorny has exhibited a commendable performance by saving 61.08% of breakpoints. This useful statistic provides valuable insights for in-game betting predictions.
A Comprehensive Overview of Performance: In the past year, Fearnley has proven to be a formidable force by triumphing in 78.18% of matches played, boasting an impressive win-loss record of 43-12. On the other hand, Pokorny has displayed their prowess by winning 58.9% of matches, with a win-loss record of 43-30. By considering this head-to-head prediction overview, a clearer picture of their potential emerges.
Unveiling the Dominant Surface: When it comes to surface preferences, Fearnley has truly excelled on the unyielding I.hard court, commanding a remarkable win percentage of 83% (44 wins out of 53 matches). Their performance on Grass, however, showcases a slightly diminished success rate of 67% (10 wins out of 15 matches). In contrast, Pokorny has achieved their best career win percentage on the challenging Hard court, winning 66% of matches (78 wins out of 119 matches). Their performance on the clay surface, however, has proven to be more challenging, with a win percentage of 46% (32 wins out of 69 matches).
Assessing Player Levels: In the past year, Fearnley has conquered numerous opponents by partaking in Challengers and ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10,000. Impressively, they have managed to clinch victory in a staggering 89.47% of matches (34 wins out of 38 matches). As for Pokorny, the majority of their battles have taken place in the Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10,000. They have emerged triumphant in 59.57% of matches (28 wins out of 47 matches). It is important to note that the relative event level at which these statistics were recorded should be considered when predicting the favorite.
Head-to-Head Battles: Fearnley and Pokorny have crossed paths on two occasions, with Fearnley emerging victorious on both occasions. They have engaged in four sets in total, with Fearnley prevailing in all sets. The most recent encounter between these skilled players took place at the Bratislava 2 Challenger on October 28, 2024. Fearnley's victory in that match was resolute, achieved through a compelling scoreline of 7-6(3) 6-1.
Examining the Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: In their previous head-to-head encounters, the average match duration between Fearnley and Pokorny was 1 hour, 16 minutes, and 31 seconds. This information provides valuable insights when predicting the outcome of extended matches.
Insights into Deciding Set Predictions: In the context of deciding sets, Fearnley and Pokorny have engaged in zero encounters, with Fearnley emerging victorious in all instances. This valuable statistic greatly contributes to predicting the outcome if this match were to go the distance.
Unveiling Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: An intriguing aspect of their clashes is the presence of tiebreaks. They have engaged in one tiebreak, with Fearnley emerging victorious in every instance, while Pokorny has yet to secure a victory in such scenarios.
Assessing Opponent Quality: In the past 12 months, Fearnley has consistently faced off against opponents with an impressive average rank of 207.22. Conversely, Pokorny has confronted players with an average rank of 468.25. These statistics speak volumes about the caliber of competition each player has encountered.
Deciding Set Performance versus All Players: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting, it is worth noting that Fearnley has emerged triumphant in a staggering 89% of deciding sets over the past year. In contrast, Pokorny has secured victory in 48% of all matches played on tour when faced with deciding sets.
Insight from Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past performance acts as a valuable indicator in predicting tennis matches, focusing on current event statistics enables us to gauge the form of the players involved. It is essential to consider the performance of the participants in present tournaments and their historical performances at specific events when making predictions.
Break Point Conversion Efficiency: Recent form indicates that Fearnley exhibits an impressive ability to convert breakpoint opportunities, succeeding in 45.33% of instances. Pokorny, while not far behind, boasts a conversion rate of 38.71% when seeking to break their opponents' serve. This statistic provides illuminating insights for in-game live betting tips, particularly when such critical moments arise.
If you are interested in exploring the realm of tennis match predictions through the lens of statistical analysis, this article serves as a promising starting point (Warning: Intended for avid statisticians).
Jacob Fearnley vs Lukas Pokorny Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Fearnley vs L. Pokorny H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 37 | Games Won | 21 |
| 17 | Aces (Total) | 19 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:18:46 | Average Match Time | 1:18:46 |
| 69% (123/179) | 1st Serve % | 59% (113/192) |
| 77% (95/123) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (73/113) |
| 59% (33/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (36/79) |
| 41% (9/22) | Break Pts Won % | 22% (2/9) |
| 43% (83/192) | Return Points Win % | 28% (51/179) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Fearnley Recent Matches Played
L. Pokorny Recent Matches Played

J. Fearnley vs L. Pokorny Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.74% (106/46) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.24% (166/124) |
| 64.12% (227/127) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.10% (377/295) |
| 55.26% (1828/1480) | Games Win/Loss | 52.65% (3429/3084) |
| 65.96% (31/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.43% (95/48) |
| 62.50% (10/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.99% (39/44) |
| 77.61% (52/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (32/32) |
| 59.09% (13/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 716 | Aces Total | 1691 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 668 | Total Double Faults | 599 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:29:49 |
| 220.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 440.39 |
| 61% (5926/9698) | 1st Serve % | 61% (11087/18084) |
| 73% (4321/5926) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (7991/11087) |
| 50% (1880/3772) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3545/6997) |
| 45% (454/1018) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (699/1716) |
| 41% (4059/10005) | Return Points Win % | 38% (7004/18288) |
| 50.00% (6/6) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.82% (10/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
| 50.00% (14/14) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 79.59% (39/10) | Challenger W/L | 46.15% (30/35) |
| 81.82% (36/8) | Futures W/L | 60.54% (135/88) |
| 72% (100/139) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (158/282) |
| 50% (5/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 57% (23/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (47/103) |
| 75% (30/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (44/95) |
| 95% (91/86) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (168/141) |
| 4% (91/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (168/27) |
| 33% (61/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (121/24) |